The Stern-o-meter
I am a man on a mission. I am absolutely convinced that we are going to see the absolute worst of David Stern this season as he manipulates the players and rallies the owners for the Collective Bargaining Agreement talks. In fact, Stern's latest comments to the media indicate that the just-begun season of actual basketball is of secondary importance to him.
Before the first tipoff took place at the Staple Center in L.A., Stern said that the league would lose "hundreds of millions of dollars" this season regardless of how "epic" the coming season might be or how the league rebounds from the recession.
Last season one of the RoF regulars set up a fanpost that was to run the entire season. It compared Okafor's performance to Chandler's and the goal was to evaluate the worthiness of the trade. I'm setting up a recurrant fanpost of my own this season.
Introducing, "The Stern-o-meter."
After endless seconds of consideration, research, and some trial and error, I have developed this amazing new gadget. It doesn't dice, it doesn't slice, and it won't make mounds of cole slaw. What this one-of-a-kind wonder WILL do however, is accurately gauge the truth, stupidity, and the manipulative strength of David Stern's comments to the media. It works on a 1-to-100 scale using scientific and utterly subjective methodology. A simple and true statement made by Stern such as, "Basketball is a sport" will garner a score of 1. A more common statement such as, "In order to save money, we're going to close 6 NBA franchises" however, would score at least in the upper 90's. Luckily enough, The Stern-o-meter also provides a translation and interpretation of any comment fed into it, so we aren't left in the dark. Today I fed into it the following quote from Der Fuehrer:
"The spirit of (the crackdown) is that our players don't do that in elementary school, in junior high, in high school, in college, and then they get their master's in complaining when they get to the NBA."
This was in regard to the need for the new technical foul rules. It scored:
56
The reason behind the score is that anyone that has ever been to a basketball game - whether it be high school, grammar school, college, or just a bunch of guys playing pickup, knows that this statement is an outright lie. Players cheer, jeer, punch the air, and complain loudly about bad calls/no calls constantly. Although I could find no medical journal recording the research, I'd bet a fair amount that this sort of thing might go back to infancy or even the womb. Stern is just trying to justify the rules modifications without exposing the truth; The changes were made to piss off the players and create another issue for the player's union to complain about during CBA talks. The trick works like this:
Come up with a bunch of things that ownership could care less about, but are important to the workers. If it costs the workers some money, so much the better. When negotiating with the union, management caves in quickly on these fairly meaningless matters. This makes them appear flexible. Then, when the meat and potatoes of the agreement are being debated, management can refuse to bend while at the same time pointing to how much they "gave up" to the players already.
Last night, as Stern walked to center court, he received what the LA press called, "a smattering of boos" from the crowd. My goal is to use the Stern-o-meter throughout the season to ensure that anywhere Stern makes a public appearance, those boos are loud enough to drown out whatever nonsense spills from his lips.
Oh, and Mr. Stern? Don't even try. I keep this gadget well hidden and the secret location changes randomly, and often. Even if you do find it, the protective security - including retina scans, finger print scans, and voice recognition technology - will prevent you from ever being able to destroy it.
Cue the Mission Impossible music. I'm out.
16 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Get back with me when it spits out mounds of cole slaw
I think it’s all posturing though. I wish Stern were a little less vocal and didn’t try to play games by spitting out ridiculous statements to the media. The contraction statement was insane. I give that a 99.
by Bring Back Primoz on Oct 27, 2010 1:28 PM EDT reply actions
The contraction statement...
and my resulting explaination of it elsewhere on the site, gave me the inspiration. Once I realized that this man is not going to shut up until a lockout is virtually guaranteed, I realized that someone, somewhere, had to record the lunacy.
For me, the contraction statement was a 90, but in that same press statement he admitted that it was a threat that would be used as a bargaining chip to gain leverage in the CBA. THAT comment, effectively tipping his hand, would rank as a 100. The only thing more stupid than his admission was the doltish manner in which the national sports media gobbled it up and regurgitated it as if the announcement of which 4 teams would be shut down was just a few days away.
My sources can beat up your sources
by Ourdaywillcome on Oct 27, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
David Stern is ruining the NBA
I bet if the investigation went further you might find his name linked to a certain Donagy, and not just because he signs his pay checks.
"It's something I think about on a day to day basis: These Colors Don't Run. Love it or leave it USA #1!"-Ricky Stanzi Iowa QB and Patriot
Blindly Optimistic follower of The Iowa Hawkeyes, San Francisco 49ers, and the Charlotte Bobcats.
So what would have to happen to oust his sorry arse?
The NBA has been on a downward spiral for like the past 15-18 years…correct me if I’m wrong
Wait for it™
by andrewlail76 on Oct 27, 2010 5:01 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I'd say the downward spiral started right around the tragic death of Len Bias.
Which was only a year or two after the retirements of Magic, Bird, and Jordan – if my memory is working today.
It rebounded a bit around the time Shaq left LA, but never really got back to the levels it was at when those events went down.
I know revenues and ratings are up (unless you listen to Stern of course) but in terms of gameplay and entertainment value, things haven’t been the same. You could point to other factors – the free agency/cap rules that virtually eliminated the concept of a “career player” going from rookie to retirement with the same team for example. But those are changes that affected other sports like the NFL just as much as they affected the NBA.
Stern is pretty deeply entrenched. I doubt he’ll be gone so much as an hour before he decides to leave and retire.
My sources can beat up your sources
by Ourdaywillcome on Oct 27, 2010 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions
I like Stern for the most part
There, I said. Ostracize.
by drapht00 on Oct 27, 2010 5:23 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
As I've expresssed frequently before here on RoF,
No sports league should have the same commissioner for such a long period of time. I’m all for establishing continuity, but variation is needed in the form of new people and new ideas. The same goes for a nation’s election, or a city’s election, or what have you. Having the same person in power for so long, especially in Stern’s case, is not a good thing.
It's pathetic watching the NBA self destruct like this.
There is absolutely no emotion to the games anymore. That’s why I think Jax has been playing bad. I seen a terrible foul call on him in a game in Dallas, and all he did was ran back down court like it was legit. Ya know, he had that “that was some bullshi* face”, but he didn’t say anything. And for the first time it hit me, and I was like damn, the players are really going to go by the rules of this. They’ve been forced to submit. What I’m curious to know, if you may answer this Ourday, is where is all the money being lost? Is attendance just down that much? Because I can’t tell from watching the games on tv. Stadiums still seem pretty full. Or is it low merchandise sales? Or something else. Either way, Stern is on some other shi* right now, and it’s got the NBA looking awful weak to me right now.
by Charlotte Bobcat on Oct 30, 2010 12:28 PM EDT reply actions
Stern’s on some Indonesian junk that’s going ’round
by bobcatRedemption on Oct 30, 2010 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions
So, "Stern is alright, the league is alright, they just seem a little weird?
I surrender but I’m not giving myself away!
My sources can beat up your sources
by Ourdaywillcome on Oct 30, 2010 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I personally think it's through creative bookeeping practices.
Hollywood is famous for it. According to Paramount for example, the film Titanic has yet to make a profit. Many very popular movies are in the red according to the studios. Another couple of examples – Grease, Ace Ventura Pet Detective, and Disney’s Aladdin have all yet to break even.
They most commonly do this nonsense when a highly-paid actor is guaranteed a percentage of the profits. The usual claim is that marketing and distribution costs ate up all the profits. It’s pure BS and everyone knows it, but if the actors bitch too loudly they get blackballed. It gets clamped down a bit more each year, but it still goes on.
I think the exact same thing exists in the NBA. The accounts-payable and accounts-receivable books are incredibly complex. There is a set of books kept by each team, a separate set kept for the ownership group, and a third set kept by the NBA administration itself. This is because profits come in from multiple contracts. TV revenue for national networks like ESPN are paid to the league for example, while local coverage (Fox SportsSouth for the Cats etc.) are paid to the individual teams. It’s very easy to juggle that kind of complex revenue system. The league itself may have lost money while the individual teams were mostly profitable.
The reason I believe it’s BS is because the Bobcats are always among the top 10 “money losers” in the league yet their own public reports indicate they lose between 6-10 million dollars per season (depending on the year – they get closer to break-even every year). So let’s be generous to the NBA and say that the bottom 10 teams lose 10 million bucks each. That’s 100 million dollars lost. That’s roughly 1/4 of what Stern claims is being lost – and don’t forget, I haven’t subtracted the profits made by the teams that ARE making money from that 100 million dollar loss yet.
It’s all accounting sleight of hand.
My sources can beat up your sources
by Ourdaywillcome on Oct 30, 2010 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions
that's intense, but enlightening
I’ve been ignorant to the nuances of the CBA situation & most of the financial landscape of the NBA. thanks for shedding some light
by bobcatRedemption on Oct 30, 2010 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Bravo, sir
You have painted the Commissioner into a corner with your analysis.
Thank you, San Francisco!

by 

















