Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dan Marino Starting College For Developmentally Disabled

Examining the Bobcats' New Sponsor

We've got until Friday before the next game, that one against the Hawks, so Bobcats news is a bit slow. However, this announcement about an agreement between the Bobcats and a company called SpongeTech caught my eye.

SpongeTech Delivery Systems, Inc. (OTCBB: SPNG) and the Charlotte Bobcats have signed a three year marketing partnership. ANC Sports, one of the Bobcats' newest partners has developed an integrated campaign which features an in-arena and direct to retail strategy to market SpongeTech's products.

Totally usual stuff... good for the Cats to get some more sponsorship money... et cetera... except...

Star-divide

I remembered Darren Rovell reported just last month that SpongeTech's advertising agreements with sports teams were unusually aggressive, leading regulators to raise questions about their business.

SpongeTech might have been able to get deals with teams, but they weren’t free. Their director of marketing Jack Schwartzberg told the SportsBusiness Journal that, in 2009, the brand’s marketing budget was $20 million. That’s an outrageous number for a company that had just announced it would gross $50 million on their fiscal year, which ended May 31.

[snip]

Earlier this month, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading on its penny stock, which at the time had hit six cents a share, so that the company could answer questions about the accuracy of their auditing practices.

To Google! Before that, Slate's financial blog, The Big Money, posted an extended face-slap of the company, essentially calling it a giant scam.

The company’s filings lead the skeptical reader to some pretty clear conclusions. The first is that Spongetech exists primarily to sell stock, and pretty much everything else comes second.

But the story doesn't stop there. Via @timothysykes, it appears the audit Rovell wrote about was delayed just a few days after the CNBC post went up because the auditor, Deloitte and Touche, resigned from the process. By my rough count after Googling, that would be three accounting firms to leave the company in under a year -- the first two forced out by regulators, it appears, and D&T leaving just to leave a toxic situation.

All that turmoil, including a two week halt on trading, didn't stop the Chicago Blackhawks from signing an agreement with the company. And it didn't stop the Bobcats.

Turmoil? The last few months have revealed SpongeTech to be a sketchy company, in the least, and, eventually, someone's going to be taken for a sucker. I know the organization is hurting for cash, but unless I'm missing something, a relationship with SpongeTech now, after all it's been through, has got to be as ill-advised as it gets. I'll guarantee there's no way the relationship lasts three years.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Perfect move by Bob Johnson

Getting Spongetech on board means that there is someone who sucks more than Johnson attached to the Bobcats.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James Dator on Nov 3, 2009 4:41 PM EST reply actions  

Whoah whoah whoah.

Let’s not go that far, now.

Remember when the Panthers had a good offensive line? Yeah, me too.
--Darin Gantt

by MichaelProcton on Nov 3, 2009 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

One hopes those revenue projections off these ads are in pencil, not pen.

Remember when the Panthers had a good offensive line? Yeah, me too.
--Darin Gantt

by MichaelProcton on Nov 3, 2009 4:49 PM EST reply actions  

Spongetech

Go to online web sites of Amazon, Kmart, and Walgreen and type in Spongetech and you will find the products. It’s not a scam. Tim Sykes is a Short trader, he makes money when the stock price goes down. The SEC documents will be cleared up shortly.

by kingfrogcash on Nov 4, 2009 7:29 AM EST reply actions  

If you’re going to argue it’s not a sketchy company, please argue with the points made in the Slate piece. Just because there are pictures of product on Amazon doesn’t mean the company doesn’t “exist primarily to sell stock, and pretty much everything else comes second.”

by David A. Arnott on Nov 4, 2009 9:01 AM EST up reply actions  

spongetech exits

I did reply to the topic, the company exists. I pointed out where you can locate the products without leaving your computer. You can take the next step and order it from the websites and see if it shows up at your home if you like more proof. Your also incorrect about the auditors. The 2nd one is still there until the 2009 10K is published. The Third auditor decided they did not want to work on the 2010 numbers. So with these facts, do you want to call a company a scam or retract your statements and wait until the matters are resolved before commenting?

by kingfrogcash on Nov 4, 2009 10:10 AM EST reply actions  

File that under: Works for Spongetech

ps. David didn’t call Spongetech a scam. He said it looks to be a “sketchy” company and he summarizes an article that states the company is a scam, but in no way does he need to retract statements since he does not voice an opinion besides that he believes the relationship won’t last three years.

by Ben Swanson on Nov 4, 2009 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

I'll say it.

It’s a scam.

Remember when the Panthers had a good offensive line? Yeah, me too.
--Darin Gantt

by MichaelProcton on Nov 4, 2009 12:06 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

If Spongetech needs a representative to get on a Charlotte Bobcats blog to defend the company...

then I think it’s worries are deeper than the SEC

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James Dator on Nov 4, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

stockholder

I’m not a company representative. I’m a stockholder. I bought my shares under 5 cents each. I plan to make a ton of money!
I found this blog because it showed up in a google search in News keyword Spongetech.

I did my research. This summer I went into a Walgreens and found the product myself.
On the shelf for “As seen on TV” and bought the last one they had. Every Walgreen, every CVS. How many stores is that? I did more research than any of these bloggers who just copy each other, so they feel they are not liable for their words.

The better question is, will the bobcats exist longer than Spongetech!

by kingfrogcash on Nov 4, 2009 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, they probably will.

The true question is: “Will spongetech sell more than the flowbee?”

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James Dator on Nov 4, 2009 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Another New Sponsor

Vandelay Industries…it’s gonna be great!

by andrewlail76 on Nov 4, 2009 12:50 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

YOU ARE NOT A MARKET ANALYSIS

David Arnott,

Stick to writing about the Bobcats. It is clear you have no clue on the stock market or naked shorts sellers like Timothy Sykes.

Darren Rovell is not a market analysis he is sports writer, a better version of you. He has no clue about the market or any of its workings.

Once again David stick to what you are already not good at, Bobcats blogging…

by TheDiplomat on Nov 17, 2009 4:17 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Charlotte Bobcats.

Managers

Whataboutbob_edited-1_small Ben Swanson

Editors

255847567_small Connor Huchton

Authors

N502541731_1711408_3038000_small Joshua Priemski

Img_1318_small DBWalker

Img_0050_small BrandonBecker

Moderators

Small BobcatDave

Small thoseareZs